Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
Professor of Strategic Studies & International Relations·Department of Economics and International Relations
Grand strategy, maritime security, and the institutions that hold armed forces accountable.
I am a professor of Strategic Studies and International Relations at the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) and at the Graduate Program in Security, Defense and Development of the Superior School of Defense (ESD), and currently a visiting scholar at the Portuguese Institute of International Relations (IPRI-NOVA). My work asks how states convert political purpose into military means — and why that translation so often breaks down between the cabinet, the staff, and the field.
Three lines of research organize my current agenda.
The first concerns grand strategy and the conduct of war. I am completing a book on the Korean War between October 1950 and July 1951 — from the first Sino-American clash to the opening of negotiations at Kaesong — built around a five-level analytical model running from grand strategy down to logistics, and around the limited-war theory of Clausewitz and Corbett. The case reveals how strategic decisions travel across levels, and what is lost, distorted, or invented along the way.
The second concerns maritime security and sea power. I have worked for a decade on the South Atlantic — the blue economy, illicit maritime economies, and the divergent security perspectives Brazil, the United States, and Europe bring to the same ocean. My current project, based at IPRI-NOVA, examines how Brexit and the Russo-Ukrainian war have reconfigured European maritime policy: the loss of British naval capability, the securitization of critical undersea infrastructure, and the widening gap between the ambitions declared in the EU Maritime Security Strategy and the operational means available to realize them. The comparative question interests me most: two regions heavily dependent on the sea, both claiming strategic autonomy, both discovering that a maritime space one cannot continuously observe is a maritime space one does not fully govern.
The third concerns civil-military relations and professional military education. Democratic control of the armed forces is not secured by constitutional text alone; it is reproduced — or eroded — in the classrooms where officers are formed. I study military education as the institutional mechanism through which strategic thought, professional norms, and the boundaries of political authority pass from one generation of commanders to the next.
Trajectory. I hold a Ph.D. and an M.Sc. in Production Engineering from the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) and a B.A. in International Relations from the University of Brasília (UnB) — a background that leaves a visible mark on how I approach defense problems, with an emphasis on systems, organizational design, and the material constraints under which strategy is actually executed.
I was a Ridgway Scholar at the U.S. Army Heritage and Education Center, and have held visiting research and teaching positions at the Josef Korbel School of International Studies (University of Denver), the Corbett Centre for Maritime Policy Studies (King's College London), the Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg (IFSH), the Faculty of Military Science of Stellenbosch University, the Rui Barbosa Chair at Leiden University, and Joaquim Chissano University in Mozambique.
In Brazil, I have worked as a contracted researcher at the Army Strategic Studies Center (CEEEx) and as principal investigator on research programs with the Army Artillery Command, alongside collaborations with the Institute for Applied Economic Research (IPEA), the Air Force University (UNIFA), the Army Command and General Staff College (ECEME), and the Navy General Staff. I am the author or editor of six books. In 2010, my doctoral dissertation received the Best Dissertation in National Defense award from the Brazilian Ministry of Defense.
This site gathers my publications, courses, and ongoing projects. Inquiries from students, colleagues, and practitioners are welcome.
A mixed-method comparative study (QCA and cluster analysis) of civilian control over military education in six countries — Brazil, Argentina, Chile, Mexico, Turkey, and South Africa — based on five variables: civilian participation in academy and staff-college curricula; political science, international relations, and strategic studies coursework; regime type; and exposure to state and non-state regional threats. Expected outputs include at least four peer-reviewed articles, a book with an international publisher, and a policy paper recommending reforms to Brazil's three military education systems, to be presented to the Office of the Chief of Staff of the Presidency and the Ministry of Defense.
A multi-institutional, interdisciplinary research network — comprising UFRGS, the Naval War College (EGN), Carlos Chagas Foundation, National War College, King's College London, and Lusófona University of Lisbon — examining the governance and protection of Brazil's "Blue Amazon" (the South Atlantic maritime domain). The project covers maritime security, naval power, critical infrastructure, transnational threats, and environmental and technological challenges (including the SisGAAz maritime monitoring system), aimed at producing policy-relevant recommendations for national defense.
Outputs:Baixo Engajamento Institucional da Diplomacia Antártica Brasileira (article, 2025)South American Navies (book chapter, 2025)
Agreement between UFRGS and the Brazilian Army's Artillery Command (Cmdo Art Ex), through the ASTROS Working Group, to produce technical reports on the operational employment, logistics, and command-and-control structure of the ASTROS missile and rocket artillery system as a factor of military transformation.
Outputs:Relatório Técnico 1 — Emprego de Mísseis de Cruzeiro em TO/A Op voltado para o Sistema de Defesa Nacional (2020)Relatório Técnico 2 — A Logística Operacional do Sistema ASTROS (2020)Relatório Técnico 3 — Estrutura de Comando e Controle do Sistema ASTROS (2021)
Research and workshop line on strategic autonomy and military innovation, conducted at the Army Strategic Studies Center (CEEEx) under the project "Global South, Power Transition, and Military Innovations in the 21st Century: Comparative Studies of South Africa, the United Arab Emirates, Taiwan, and Turkey." The project develops a five-dimension analytical model of strategic autonomy — regional status, domestic political stability, alliance management, reduction of external defense-technology dependence, and export of capabilities — applied comparatively across four middle powers, with the Brazilian case serving as the benchmark for the final analysis. It assesses the Brazilian Army's capacity to independently produce operational concepts, doctrine, and weapon systems, mapping areas of autonomy and external dependence to inform a capability-endogenization roadmap.
Outputs:Choques Externos e Inércia Interna: Obstáculos Organizacionais à Inovação Militar em Taiwan (essay, 2025)The Challenges in the Transformation of South Africa's Defense: Lessons for Brazil? (essay, 2025)Strategic Autonomy of Medium Powers: The Cases of Turkey and the United Arab Emirates from the Arab Spring to the Ukraine War (essay, 2026)Strategic Autonomy and Grand Strategy of Middle Powers: A Comparative Analysis with Focus on Brazil (article, 2026)Some Reflections on Military Innovation from the Domestic Point of View (chapter, 2025)